1. According to the lectures, the rules
of etiquette are 7. According to the concept of morality
outlined by Stef in his lectures and outlines, the main
kind(s) of internal sanctions that come with morality
is/are the following: 2. The following claim is not
normative 8. An isolation test, outlined by G.E.
Moore, allows us to determine that 3. The claim (judgment) that "The Pope
thinks that active euthanasia is always wrong"
belongs to 9. According to Bentham and Mill 4. The claim that "sometimes euthanasia
is permissible" belongs to 10. A pluralist about intrinsic
values would maintain that 5. The claim that hunting deer is boring
belongs to 11. Suppose that someone thinks that
money is good only in so far as we can use it to buy some
other goods; such a person would think that 6. The main focus of ethical inquiry
is 12. The following are problems with the
Divine Command Theory: 13. Stef argued in class that universal
religions (such as mainstream versions of Christianity,
Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, etc.) 19. According to utilitarians the
consequences of a right action 14. Supererogatory acts 20. According to utilitarianism, the
moral status of an action (whether an action is right or
wrong) depends on 15. Stef and Shaw maintain that 21. The following is not a
consequentialist theory 16. Stef characterized in class
cults as systems of norms that 22 The "injustice objection" discussed in
class is a common objection to 17. According to consequentialism, the
moral status of a given action (i.e. whether an act is right
or wrong, obligatory or forbidden, etc.) depends 23. One problem for utilitarian theory is
that, since this theory requires to maximize utility 18. According to deontology, the moral
status of a given action (i.e. whether this act is right or
wrong, obligatory or forbidden, etc.) depends 24. A main problem for Kant's ethical
theory discussed in class is that this theory
.
A) normative
B) purely descriptive
C) based on religion
D) none of the above.
A) the feelings of guilt, shame, pride, etc.
B) disapproval and anger of others, ostracism
C) prison terms and fines
D) none of the above.
A) lawyers ought to tell the truth to their clients
B) doctors ought to tell the truth to their
patients
C) Beethoven's IX symphony is beautiful
D) The Rocky Mountains are old.
A) something has intrinsic value
B) some version of consequentialism is true
C) no version of Consequentialism is true.
A) metaethics
B) applied ethics
C) descriptive ethics
D) all of the above
A) pleasure only is intrinsically good and pain only is
intrinsically bad
B) eudaimonia (understood as, flourishing
happiness) is intrinsically good;
C) there are many different things that are
intrinsically goo
A) metaethics
B) applied ethics
C) descriptive ethics
D) all of the above
A) there are no universal moral standards and morality
depends on what a given culture believes is right or
wrong;
B) there are many different things which are
intrinsically valuable
C) none of the above
A) metaethics
B) applied ethics
C) theoretical ethics
D) none of the above (e.g., it's not an ethical claim).
A) money has instrumental value
B) money has intrinsic value
C) both A) and B);
D) none of the above
A) how we ought to act, what kinds of people we ought to be,
what kind of situations and outcomes are good and bad
B) the evaluation of law
C) the evaluation of political and social movements
D) describing what people do and think in various
societies
A) this theory implies that God has no moral reasons
to issue His commands;
B) this theory implies that God acts in morally
arbitrary (whimsical way);
C) this theory does not help us to understand how God
is all good
D) all of the above.
A) frequently require of us to act contrary to
morality
B) frequently require of us to act contrary to reason
and common sense
C) rarely (or never) require of us to act contrary
to morality and reason.
A) can include some negative utility.
B) can include some positive utility
C) can include short run utility
D) can include long run utility
E) all of the above
A) go beyond the call of duty
B) are merely morally permissible
C) are morally required
D) none of the above.
A) consequences of this action, so if the action has
positive balance of utility this action is morally
right;
B) A and the consequences of other actions, so an
action can have a positive balance of utility and yet be
morally wrong if there is another action that has even
better balance of utility;
C) whether an agent fulfilled his duties.
A) moral norms and legal norms ought to be extensional
equivalent (that is, whatever is prohibited by law must also
be prohibited by morality and vice versa).
B) morality and law must be totally separate (that is,
no action may be prohibited both by law and by morality)
C) moral norms and legal norms may overlap partially
but not completely
D) none of the above
A) ethical egoism
B) utilitarianism
C) (radical) ethical altruism
D) Ross's system of prima facie duties
E) they are all versions of consequentialism
A) frequently require of us to act contrary to morality and
reason
B) rarely (or never) require of of us to act
contrary to morality and reason.
A) Utilitarian ethical theory.
B) Kant's ethical theory
C) A) and B)
D) none of the above
A) solely on what agents think about this action
B) on the value brought about by the results of
performing this action
C) something other than the consequences of this
action.
A) there are too many actions that would count as
supererogatory
B) it's hard to see that any action would count as
supererogatory
C) none of the above
A) solely on what agents think about this action
B) on the value brought about by the results of
performing this action
C) something other than the consequences of this
action.
A) is not very clear about what it means to treat someone
merely as a means
B) allows someone to be treated as a means
C) allows someone to be treated merely as a means
D) does not allow anyone to be treated merely as a means
E) none of the above.
1A : According to the lectures, the rules of
etiquette are
A) normative
2D. The following claim is not normative --
D) The Rocky Mountains are old. (it's a statement of
geographical fact)
(C) was not a good answer for it seems to express a norm of
etiquette.
In general, normative judgments use a normative (or
evaluative) term; e.g., right, wrong, obligatory, permissible,
good, bad, beautiful, etc.
3C: This claim is a description of what the Pope thinks (it does not tell us what is right or wrong but only what the Pope thinks about the right and wrong)
4. The claim that "sometimes euthanasia is
permissible" belongs to (B) applied ethics and not to A)
metaethics
It's an application of some general/universal rule to some
more specific cases, this is why it's applied ethics.
Other examples http://falcon.tamucc.edu/~sencerz/judgments.htm
5. The claim that hunting deer is boring belongs to D) none of the above (e.g., it's not an ethical claim).
6. The main focus of ethical inquiry is A) how we ought to act, what kinds of people we ought to be, what kind of situations and outcomes are good and bad
7. According to the concept of morality outlined
by Stef in his lectures and outlines, the main kind(s) of internal
sanctions that come with morality is/are the following A) the
feelings of guilt, shame, pride, etc.
Incidentally, this is why morality and religion are frequently
confused. People who violate religious requirements frequently have
similar reactions (i.e., they feel guilty).
8. An isolation test, outlined by G.E. Moore,
allows us to determine that
A) something has intrinsic value
Read more here:.
9. According to Bentham and Mill
A) pleasure only is intrinsically good and pain only is
intrinsically bad .
The difference between Bentham and Mill is that Bentham endorses
quantitative hedonism, while Mill opts for qualitative
hedonism. The difference is reflected in the famous Mill 's saying
that it's better to be a dissatisfied Socrates than satisfied pig
(for higher pleasures of humans are sufficient compensation for
possible dissatisfactions).
10. A pluralist about intrinsic values would
maintain that
B) there are many different things which are intrinsically
valuable
For example, according to G.E. Moore, the experience of beauty
is intrinsically valuable.
Some philosophers argue that knowledge and the true perception of
reality have intrinsic value.
Some of us think that freedom is intrinsically valuable, and so
on.
By contrast, a hedonist would maintain that all those things are
merely means to pleasure.
11. Suppose that someone thinks that money is good
only in so far as we can use it to buy some other goods; such a
person would think that
A) money has instrumental value
12. The following are problems with the Divine
Command Theory:
D) all of the above.
Arthur reviews some of these difficulties in Morality
Without God
13. Stef argued in class that universal religions (such as mainstream versions of Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, etc.) C) rarely (or never) require of us to act contrary to morality and reason. (I also said, we are lucky.)
14. Supererogatory acts A) go beyond the call of duty.
15. Stef and Shaw maintain that C) moral norms and legal norms may overlap partially but not completely
16. Stef characterized in class cults as systems of norms that A) frequently require of us to act contrary to morality and reason
17. According to consequentialism, the moral
status of a given action (i.e. whether an act is right or wrong,
obligatory or forbidden, etc.) depends
B) on the value brought about by the results of performing this
action
in other words, it depends on the consequences of doing (or failing
to do) this act
19. According to deontology, the moral status of a given action (i.e. whether this act is right or wrong, obligatory or forbidden, etc.) depends C) something other than the consequences of this action. (The moral status may depend, e.g., on what agent's duties are, or on whether or not the agent violates someone's rights)
20. According to utilitarianism, the moral status
of an action (whether an action is right or wrong) depends on
B) A and the consequences of other actions, so an action
can have a positive balance of utility and yet be morally wrong if
there is another action that has even better balance of utility;
It's a common mistake to ignore the alternatives to doing (or not
doing) a given act.
21. The following is not a consequentialist
theory
D) Ross's system of prima facie duties
22 The "injustice objection" discussed in class is
a common objection to
A) Utilitarian ethical theory.
Other versions of consequentialism may encounter the same problem.
Deontology may be treated as an attempt to respond to this theory.
23. One problem for utilitarian theory is that,
since this theory requires to maximize utility
B) it's hard to see that any action would count as
supererogatory
24. A main problem for Kant's ethical theory
discussed in class is that this theory
A) is not very clear about what it means to treat someone merely as a
means
The general Kantian idea is to treat people with respect.
One way to explain what it means is to elucidate the concept of
respect in terms of respect for autonomy., and to elucidate the
respect for autonomy in terms of consent
But this also has problems.
Problem 1: It would be too much to expect explicit consent in
every situation, so sometimes we have to settle for hypothetical
consent.
Problem 2: Even when we have an explicit consent, our actions
may be wrong; for this consent may be given without access to full
information or bt someone who is not rational.
Problem 3: Sometimes we seem justified in constraining someone
without his or her consent.
Other possible questions:
What is the difference between positive and negative rights?
Examples of positive and negative rights?
Can Rule Utilitarians allow for respect for rules, rights?
Can Rule Utilitarians explain how supererogatory acts are possible?
GOOD LUCK ON THE QUIZ!!!